| Home | Introduction | Power of thought | Reality | Expert in creation | New politics | beliefs manipulations sects |
| In 't nederlands | Cette page en fran�ais |
| 1) | Meditation (Stay calm, stop thinking) | |
| 2) | Dowsing (pendulum, Lecher antenna, rod) | |
| 3) | Cards laying (Tarot of Marseilles) | |
| 4) | Astrology (only to predict "one" future) |
| Imagine a scientist who is the first to investigate intuition. He finds certain things and gives a conclusive demonstration of his findings to a public with varied personalities. In this public is a general of the army. The reactions of this public will vary of course, from total rejection to total acceptance. But the army general has another view of things: for him, even if it's contrary to his belief system, and even if the phenomena are explainable or not, if it works, he will be able to predict the movements of the enemy. Imagine now the thoughts in the head of this general : I have super powerful bombs, but what is their use if the enemy "knows" where I'm going to use them ? Thus, I have to have a technique to know in advance what are the actions of the enemy. And as a result, I will always be on the winning side. And of course it must be avoided that the enemy has a similar technique. |
![]() |
![]() |
Needless to say that the scientist will have "disappeared" the next morning, and you will find him working in a military research centre, with his salary tripled, and an unlimited budget for his top secret research on the subject. Also a "colossal" budget will be spent to avoid that the information will come to the ears of the "enemy". It's even probable that the investment will be superior to that of the weapons making, because due to that technique, the weapons are less effective. (By the way : In the US you have the CIA, central intelligence agency, or central intuition agency or both ?) |
| Imagine a high school professor, with an extraordinary intelligence and a doctors degree in several branches. Really a person you can ask all kinds of questions, and he will respond correctly and sincerely. Then you want to test if the responses of that professor are reproducible, and you ask him ten times the same question. It is likely that the second or third time you ask the question, the professor won't answer any more or give you a wrong answer. Therefore you may conclude that this professor is not reproducible, and that his answers are not better than hazard. The intuition is something natural, and responds to laws of nature and is not some "mechanical" thing. And if you do not know these laws, or even the existence of them, you might make a bad scientific conclusion. |
![]() |
| A) | To have a good intelligence, acquire a lot knowledge in schools, seminars and courses, then have a good diploma, and then forget 90% of it, and take the others who don't have the possibility to have the same knowledge for inferior ones. | |
| B) | To have a good intelligence, acquire a lot knowledge in schools, seminars and courses, and add the intuition which is a reservoir of 100 times the knowledge your memory can take (conscious memory), and in which you can dig the necessary information for each moment, for you or for the others. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Back |
Up |
Next |