| Home | Intro | Intuition | Power of thought | Reality | Expert in creation | beliefs manipulations sects |
| In 't nederlands | Cette page en français |
| What is less obvious is that the ideas of this politician are presented to us through the corrupted media. And what's more is that a politician may express some ideas, but can have totally different ideas in the back of his mind. (Lying is "normal" in actual politics and is mainly used for selfish purposes, whereas the spiritual master almost never lies, or eventually a few times, but then temporarily and for the highest good of all. Not lying is a personal choice and comes from the motivation based on personal spiritual discoveries like the universal laws for instance.) So, if in a democracy you can vote for people on whom you have been wrongly informed, then you can say that your vote is worthless. I such a case you could also state that it's not a democracy. We hear pronouncing the word "democracy" hundreds of times in political discourses, (especially from the actual American president of 2008) thereby advocating the fall of the dictatorships to replace them by a democracy. |
![]() |
![]() |
In history there have been good ideas like communism that offered shelter and food for everyone, but it's their application that has left a lot to be desired. We could see that after Russia changed from communism to a "democracy"(?), then suddenly appeared a lot of millionaires that would go on vacation elsewhere in Europe. (This means that they applied the communism in the sense of : Everybody the same, but a lot more for me..) Whatever the actual type of politics in a country, the outcome is always that the leaders are an elite who have (taken) a lot of liberties, and the people have much less freedom. |
| Actually a not very spiritual government who leads a not very spiritual population is like blind men guiding other blind men, and leading them straight towards a wall. (But I am optimistic and believe that at the moment (5/2008) a great deal of the people on earth have seen that we are heading towards a wall, but do not see the solution which is of a spiritual nature) | ![]() |
![]() |
It is recommended, but not absolutely necessary that the complete population is spiritually enlightened. A lot of people simply want an easy life on earth with their family without interesting themselves in all kinds of religions or spiritualities. But at the moment these people are "harassed" by all kinds of problems like: Will I have something to eat tomorrow? Will I have enough money tomorrow? What is my guarantee that there will not be some kind of weirdo that will start a war tomorrow? Even those that live in calm and politically safe places on earth are considered to be "primitives" and do not have access to the basic comfort like a home, food, drinking water, heating… |
| When I say it is not absolutely necessary that a population is spiritually enlightened, it still is highly recommended because in this case they can be vigilant towards their leaders to avoid drifting. As are the spiritually enlightened people of today that see clearly that our governments are completely "off track". Also, the non-spiritually enlightened people could have the tendency to go into opposition because of their incomplete belief system, and the envy to do things contrary to the universal laws. (This can bring about the same problems as there are today with no evolution possible.) | ![]() |
| About the financial aspect: it would be very useful to reduce the financial system to one planetary currency. (Euro + Amero = Urano ?)
That would avoid speculations and making money with money due to exchange rates. It would also facilitate the exchange of goods with other civilisations! I will not dwell on the financial subject, because I am sure that in the financial world they are already thinking about it, or they are already working on it. |
![]() |
| 1) | That the ones that would like to be part of a council (communal, local or planetary) present themselves spontaneously, highlighting their life experiences and their spiritual evolution. That they also give the permission (because of freewill) to the concerned council (and only to this council) to look intuitively if he/she is suited for this service in the council. (Remark : This will already eliminate all of the false personalities, the liars, and the ones speaking with fantastic words and sentences without consistency or sincerity. It will also eliminate the ones who think being capable of such a job, but who aren't. (Hard for the ego!)) |
|
| 2) | To get to a higher level in the councils, the most adequate is that the higher councils choose their members among the lower councils. That means that a member of a local council could be chosen by the planetary council to join them, after having posted himself or herself as a candidate. | |
| 3) | Inside the planetary council, we can imagine a "brainstorm" meeting where the intuitive and intellectual information is gathered to find out who will be in the superior council. | |
| 4) | Finally, the supreme council is not chosen by the inferior councils, but by a superior spiritual hierarchy who is the only one authorized to decide if the chosen persons are capable of assuming the great responsibility of being in the supreme council. (Taking decisions that could affect the whole planet.) This spiritual hierarchy is not from earth, (watch your belief system!) and will choose or decide with a method not revealed to me at this moment. |
![]() |
Let's begin at the lowest level of this new politics hierarchy. In fact, according to my intuitive ideas, the total hierarchy would be composed of 3 x 3 levels. The first level is the town or village possessing its communal council with its superior and supreme council. For a little village this could be no more that 10 people, but for large towns it could be 100 or more. Then the next level is the local council based on the language region. (I'm not speaking about dialects) with its 3 councils, and finally you have the planetary council. |
![]() |
| Let's take an example with the Basque territory. (Between France and Spain)
As the Basque language is nor French nor Spanish nor a dialect of one of these two, it's obvious that this group of villages and towns would be gathered in one linguistic area. (The Basque language with its communal and local councils.) If you want to annex such a region to another linguistic region, it's like depriving the people of a certain identity, and that causes problems. |
| In a village flows a river that causes flooding from time to time when it rains tremendously. The houses near the river are then inundated. One of the collected ideas will probably be to make the river flow into tubes, or construct a dyke to avoid overflowing.
Such a problem is mostly treated in our actual "democracies" to get the river to flow into tubes that are too small, (for financial reasons) and then only in front of the houses of those that could shout the loudest. This moves the problem upstream, and there it floods other houses. Or the problem is treated by constructing a dyke that is really effective to correct the problem, but deprives the inhabitants of the beautiful view on the valley with the river. This makes the spot less pleasant to live. |
![]() |
![]() |
With a communal council as described in this article, who works with spiritual principles, with intuition and for the highest good of all, such a problem would be treated differently: The best solution would probably be to separate the river partially into adequate tubes defined intuitively. The diameter of these tubes would be defined taking into account that in the future it could rain even more. This last information cannot be defined with intelligence only. This solution does not deprive the inhabitants of their magnificent view on the river, and it guides the superfluous water into the tubes by heavy rainfall. Yes but what about the financial aspect ? It's obvious that if the financials are the same as the ones who manage the planet actually, and love to fill their pockets as much as possible, the best solution will not be applicable. |
| In a village or town, there is an airport. Let's admit that there are no technologies available to render the airplanes "silent" or faster. In this case, whatever the direction the plains are taking off or landing, they will inevitably pass over adjacent villages or towns. These villages will be subject to visual and sound annoyances. (visual annoyances because if 30 plains in an hour pass over your garden at low altitude, it's not funny even if you don't hear them.) | ![]() |
![]() |
Here the competences of the local / linguistic council will be used to eventually change the geographic location of the airport to a more deserted place, and to build the road infrastructure that comes with it. Or to propose to the population living in the concerned area to move out giving them the adequate financial aid. (And not like in the actual democracies where they make a new law, so that your complaints are no longer allowed, or that they don't have an effect. Or even push the responsibilities on others and play "ping-pong". Meanwhile nothing happens.) |
| As example, let's take all the information circulating on the media networks. On earth, the systems and technologies to transport information are already well developed. There are radios, TV's, newspapers, and the magnificent tool called internet. On those networks are circulation tremendous amounts of information. These technologies could eventually be developed even more and more rapidly if the commercial / banking governments would be replaced by intuitive and cooperative governments with a policy for the highest good of all. In this latter case, the planetary council would NOT be there to apply any censorship, but to make sure that these tools are not used for any propaganda, to promote personal interests or to misinform. |
![]() |
| Complete site with annexes (PDF) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Back |
Up |
Next |